<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richmond Leaders</title>
	<link>http://www.richmondleaders.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Long Run: Tough Times Ahead for Charities</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/12/the-long-run-tough-times-ahead-for-charities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/12/the-long-run-tough-times-ahead-for-charities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 15:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Thalhimer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Views]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/12/the-long-run-tough-times-ahead-for-charities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many charitable organizations have a June 30 fiscal year, so this is a good time to look forward to fiscal 2009. Budgets are being set, and the seeds of success or failure are being laid. What will the new fiscal year hold in store?
My expectation is that fiscal 2009 will be a very tough year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many charitable organizations have a June 30 fiscal year, so this is a good time to look forward to fiscal 2009. Budgets are being set, and the seeds of success or failure are being laid. What will the new fiscal year hold in store?</p>
<p>My expectation is that fiscal 2009 will be a very tough year for many charities. While some are already feeling the effects of a slowing economy, the full force may not yet have been felt. Consider corporate giving. Corporations generally operate on a calendar year, and calendar 2008 budgets were set in August and September of 2007, which was before the stock market&#8217;s October peak. Calendar 2009 budgets will be set during a much more cautious environment. Banks, which are often very generous givers, continue to be hit hard by loan defaults. Declining corporate profitability does not bode well for charitable giving next year.</p>
<p>Consider foundation donors, which have faced declining asset values in their investment portfolios. Foundations give a percentage of assets, so their budgets in the next fiscal year are likely to be lower unless the investment markets recover strongly.<br />
Consider individual donors. They are bearing the brunt of the decline in housing values, and they are being pounded by high inflation in such key areas as food, energy and health care. This is bound to impact many household budgets and, thus, charitable giving. I have already witnessed a decline in gifts coming from marketable securities, which reflects declining asset values. Anecdotally, I have heard stories of auction items receiving very low bids at fund raisers.<br />
So, it seems a pretty good bet that 2009 will be a tough one for charitable organizations. What can they do about it?<br />
First, budget very conservatively. Start with your tightest budget and reduce it by 10 percent. This will force you to keep expenses low, particularly on the personnel side where you need to move early in the year to have any impact on the budget.<br />
Second, ask early! If this negative scenario unfolds it will get progressively worse as fiscal 2009 progresses. Early asks are more likely to be successful than later ones. Make your asks as attractive as possible for corporate and other donors to get them to commit ASAP.<br />
Third, devise less expensive ways donors can participate. Whenever they can substitute volunteer time for a cash gift, that&#8217;s a great idea. Or, if you are in a capital campaign, sell more bricks because they may go a lot faster than more expensive naming opportunities.<br />
Fourth, pay a LOT of attention to your wealthiest donors. They will be least affected by the economy. Let them know of your concerns and your need for their increased support in the coming year. Give them time to plan, so they can be responsive to your need. They will be impressed that you are planning ahead rather than waiting for difficulties to occur.<br />
Fifth, focus on new friend raising. I have found in past recessions that when giving slows down I can invest time in forming new relationships. While this may not help in the current fiscal year, it lays the groundwork for a very strong recovery when the economy eventually turns for the better. Invest slack time in face-to-face meetings with people who can be helpful to your charity.<br />
Sixth, involve the entire board in owning and solving the problem. Make them aware of the possibility of a tough year from the very beginning. If you emerge from a tough period with the board engaged and enthused, then you will have laid the groundwork for great successes in the good times.</p>
<p>Recessions are not to be feared. They are a fact of life. A successful charitable organization, like a successful business, needs to survive many of them over time. Good preparation and solid execution will be rewarded in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/12/the-long-run-tough-times-ahead-for-charities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Nixon THE One?</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/09/is-nixon-the-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/09/is-nixon-the-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chip Jones</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/09/is-nixon-the-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Perlstein’s sprawling, rollicking book arrives hard on the heels of a contest of empathy-exhibitionism in which the two Democratic presidential candidates competed to see who could more ardently adore churchgoing, gun-owning, not-at-all-bitter working-class Pennsylvanians.
Continue reading at the New York Times.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Perlstein’s sprawling, rollicking book arrives hard on the heels of a contest of empathy-exhibitionism in which the two Democratic presidential candidates competed to see who could more ardently adore churchgoing, gun-owning, not-at-all-bitter working-class Pennsylvanians.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/11/books/review/Will-t.html?8bu&amp;emc=bua1" target="_blank">Continue reading at the New York Times</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/09/is-nixon-the-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guantanamo&#8217;s Long Shadow on U.S. Foreign Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/09/guantanamos-long-shadow-on-us-foreign-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/09/guantanamos-long-shadow-on-us-foreign-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chip Jones</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/09/guantanamos-long-shadow-on-us-foreign-policy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON — When the Pentagon announced in March that Maj. Gen. Jay W. Hood would become the senior American officer based in Pakistan, it reflected the military’s aim to put a crisis-tested veteran in a critical job at a pivotal time in the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban in Pakistan’s tribal areas.
Continue reading [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — When the Pentagon announced in March that Maj. Gen. Jay W. Hood would become the senior American officer based in <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/pakistan/index.html?inline=nyt-geo" title="More news and information about Pakistan.">Pakistan</a>, it reflected the military’s aim to put a crisis-tested veteran in a critical job at a pivotal time in the fight against <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/a/al_qaeda/index.html?inline=nyt-org" title="More articles about Al Qaeda.">Al Qaeda</a> and the <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/t/taliban/index.html?inline=nyt-org" title="More articles about the Taliban.">Taliban</a> in Pakistan’s tribal areas.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/09/world/asia/09general.html?th&amp;emc=th" target="_blank">Continue reading at the New York Times</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/09/guantanamos-long-shadow-on-us-foreign-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big TV&#8217;s Big Secret: Ignoring Pentagon&#8217;s Propaganda Program</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/08/big-tvs-big-secret-ignoring-pentagons-propaganda-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/08/big-tvs-big-secret-ignoring-pentagons-propaganda-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chip Jones</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/08/big-tvs-big-secret-ignoring-pentagons-propaganda-program/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even with countless media outlets available these days, a Sunday New York Times cover story could always be counted on to send a jolt through the television news cycle. But apparently that’s no longer the case.
Read more at Politico.com.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with countless media outlets available these days, a Sunday New York Times cover story could always be counted on to send a jolt through the television news cycle. But apparently that’s no longer the case.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10204.html" target="_blank">Read more at Politico.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/08/big-tvs-big-secret-ignoring-pentagons-propaganda-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Your Calendars: May 20 is Obama&#8217;s (Official) Victory Party</title>
		<link>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/08/mark-your-calendars-may-20-is-obamas-official-victory-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/08/mark-your-calendars-may-20-is-obamas-official-victory-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 20:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chip Jones</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/08/mark-your-calendars-may-20-is-obamas-official-victory-party/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not long after the polls close in the May 20 Kentucky and Oregon primaries, Barack Obama plans to declare victory in his bid for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Continue reading at Politico.com.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not long after the polls close in the May 20 Kentucky and Oregon primaries, Barack Obama plans to declare victory in his bid for the Democratic presidential nomination.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10184.html" target="_blank">Continue reading at Politico.com.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richmondleaders.com/2008/05/08/mark-your-calendars-may-20-is-obamas-official-victory-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
